JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024 1
JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024
E-ISSN: 2984-7435, P-ISSN: 2984-7427
EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S INTERNAL
SUPERVISORY APPARATUS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION: A
CASE STUDY OF THE INSPECTORATE GENERAL OF THE MINISTRY OF
HOME AFFAIRS
Septia Mentari, Irfan Ridwan Maksum
Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Email: septiamenta[email protected], irm[email protected]
Abstract
Regional government is one element of government administration that has an important role
in realizing good governance. In order to achieve this goal, local governments need to carry out
their government functions effectively and efficiently. The aim of this research is to determine
the performance of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) in carrying out
supervision of regional government administration. This research uses descriptive qualitative
research methods. Data collection techniques in this research are literature study, interviews
and observation. The data that has been collected is then analyzed through three stages, namely
data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions. The research results show that the
performance of the APIP Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs in carrying out
supervision of regional government administration is generally quite good. This is proven by
the good quality of supervision results, the high reliability of supervision results, and the
effectiveness of follow-up to supervision results which is quite high.
keywords: Apparatus Performance, Government Internal, Supervisory Apparatus, Implementation
of Supervision, Administration
INTRODUCTION
Local government is a key element in responsible governance in realizing the concept of
good governance. In an effort to achieve this goal, local governments have the responsibility to
carry out their government functions optimally, effectively, and efficiently (Siregar & Salomo,
2020). Therefore, to ensure effective, efficient, and accountable local governance, effective
supervision is needed. Through effective supervision, local governments can prevent violations,
assess and improve the performance of their agencies, and increase accountability for their
actions. Effective supervision plays a role in ensuring that local government activities are carried
out in accordance with the principles of good governance, the rule of law, and established policies.
Septia Mentari, Irfan Ridwan Maksum
2 JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024
Thus, effective supervision has an important role in maintaining the integrity and quality of local
government administration (Sari, 2013).
The Government Internal Supervision Apparatus (APIP) is an institution that has an
important role in overseeing the implementation of local government. Its duties and functions
include conducting internal supervision of various aspects of local governance, including
supervision of financial management at the regional level (Syarifudin, 2014). In its capacity as an
internal supervisor, APIP is responsible for evaluating processes, procedures, and compliance with
applicable regulations, as well as providing recommendations for improvement if discrepancies
or weaknesses in the local governance system are found. This aims to ensure that the use of public
funds and policy processes in the regions is carried out transparently, accountably, and in
accordance with applicable regulations (EFFENDI, 2023)
The Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs (Inspektorat Jenderal Kemendagri)
is an APIP institution that has a role as the highest internal supervision entity within the Ministry
of Home Affairs. Its authority includes conducting internal supervision of various aspects of local
government administration throughout Indonesia, including supervision of regional financial
management. Evaluation of the performance of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home
Affairs in supervising the implementation of local government is important to assess how effective
this institution is in carrying out its duties (Hara & Adib, 2014)
Previous research by Yohanes, (2018) showed that (1) The role of the Government Internal
Auditor (APIP) in the administration of local government in Bulungan Regency was realized
through the implementation of a comprehensive examination of the implementation of
government affairs by local government officials in Bulungan Regency, which included an
examination of institutional and personnel aspects; examination of financial aspects; and
examination of aspects of local government asset management. (2) The application of the concept
of comprehensive inspection in the implementation of periodic examinations causes the role of
the Government Internal Auditor (APIP) in the implementation of local government in Bulungan
Regency to be ineffective.
Another study by Utari & Wibowo, (2021) concluded that the condition of Discipline, Work
Environment, Work Motivation and Performance of the Government Internal Supervision
Apparatus (APIP) of the Bojonegoro Regency Inspectorate was good. Discipline, work
environment and work motivation have a positive and significant influence on the performance
of the Government Internal Supervision Apparatus (APIP) of the Bojonegoro Regency
Inspectorate. Similar research by Herlina et al., (2023) shows that the performance of the
Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) of the Wajo Regency Regional Inspectorate
consisting of Audit, Review, Evaluation, Monitoring and Other Activities is good and shows
compliance with the rules implemented according to their duties and functions. The facilities and
infrastructure owned are quite adequate. Factors that support the performance of APIP Regional
Inspectorate of Wajo Regency are by following the development of competence in the field of
Evaluation of the Performance of the Government's Internal Supervisory Apparatus in
Local Government Supervision: a Case Study of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry
of Home Affairs
JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024 3
supervision, as for the inhibiting factors, namely weather and distance to the location of
surveillance.
The novelty of this research is from the object of his research, namely the performance of
the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) of the inspectorate general of the ministry
of home affairs in the implementation of supervision of local government administration which
has never been studied before. The results of this study can help local governments to improve
the effectiveness of local governance, because it can provide information about potential
deviations and improvements that need to be made. The purpose of this study is to determine
the performance of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) in carrying out
supervision of local government administration.
METHODS
This study used descriptive qualitative research method. Descriptive qualitative research
method is a research approach that aims to describe in detail the observed phenomena or events.
This approach prioritizes a thorough understanding of a topic or event, describing it in depth, and
presenting complete and detailed information. This method relies on analysis of descriptive data,
which can be observations, interviews, field notes, or documents to understand and explain the
phenomenon under study (Yuliani, 2018). The types of data in this study are secondary and
primary data. Data collection techniques in this study are literature studies, interviews and
observations. The data that has been collected will go through three stages of analysis, namely
data reduction (reduction of complexity), presentation of data (systematic presentation of
information), and drawing conclusions (interpretation of analysis results).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In Indonesia, there are many supervisory institutions and agencies. Supervision itself is
carried out in order to control and reduce irregularities in government administration so that an
organization is able to achieve goals and have good performance based on laws and regulations.
In the Ministry of Home Affairs itself, the supervision component is found in the Inspectorate
General of Home Affairs (Fathanah & Kasim, 2022). Supervision as an observation made by the
leader so that activities and actions related to organizational goals can run according to plan. One
of the internal control systems in government agencies is aimed at overseeing the management
of state finances effectively, efficiently and economically over the budget that has been allocated
to each government agency (Prihartono et al., 2018)
Supervision is an activity carried out to ascertain whether the actions carried out are as
planned. Supervision is carried out not to find fault with a person but to confirm between the
results and the work plan, thus obtaining information that matches reality. Therefore, supervision
Septia Mentari, Irfan Ridwan Maksum
4 JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024
is carried out not to find faults but rather coaching (Bakri et al., 2019). Within the framework of
public accountability, supervision is one of the efforts to realize and maintain public legitimacy to
assess government performance achievements by establishing an adequate supervision activity,
both in terms of internal supervision and in terms of external supervision (Priyadi, 2023).
Supervision according to its scope according to Syawalina et al., (2022) can be divided into
internal supervision and external supervision are:
a. Internal Supervision is supervision carried out by supervisory apparatuses originating from the
internal environment of government organizations. When further detailed, internal supervision
can be divided into internal supervision in the narrow sense and internal supervision in the
broad sense.
b. External Supervision, External Supervision is a form of supervision carried out by a supervisory
unit that is completely from outside the executive organization environment so that in this
external supervision, between supervisors and supervised parties there is no longer an official
relationship.
Institutions and Authorities for the Implementation of Supervision and Inspection in
Indonesia include:
1. Internal Surveillance Institute
2. Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP)
3. Inspectorate General of Ministries
4. Province/City/District Inspectorate
5. External Supervision Agency
6. Audit Board
7. DPR, DPD, and DPRD
Presidential Regulation Number 68 of 2019 concerning the Organization of State Ministries
and Presidential Regulation Number 11 of 2015 concerning the Ministry of Home Affairs explain
that the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs as APIP has the task of carrying out
internal supervision within the Ministry of Home Affairs and supervision of the implementation of
provincial and regency/city local governments (Siregar & Salomo, 2020). Government Regulation
Number 60 of 2008 related to the Government Internal Control System (SPIP), has explained the
role of effective APIP at least must convey adequate confidence in compliance, savings, efficiency
and effectiveness in achieving the objectives of implementing the duties and functions of a
government agency. APIP is required to be a more effective institution in its performance since
the issuance of Government Regulation No. 60 of 2008, which makes the scope of APIP's role a
forum for consultation and provides a sense of confidence to the government (Dewi, 2022).
The duties and functions of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs in
supervising the implementation of local government are outlined in Government Regulation
Number 12 of 2017 concerning Development and Supervision of Regional Government
Implementation where this regulation further strengthens what has been regulated in Law
Evaluation of the Performance of the Government's Internal Supervisory Apparatus in
Local Government Supervision: a Case Study of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry
of Home Affairs
JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024 5
Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government which regulates the authority of the
Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs in conducting general supervision towards
the administration of local government and coordinate technical supervision of the administration
of local government. The Permendagri number 13 of 2021 concerning SOTK of the Ministry of
Home Affairs, mandates in article 664 that "The Special Inspectorate as referred to in Article 640
letter f, has the task of carrying out special examinations, handling community complaints/reports,
examinations in the context of imposing administrative sanctions and coordinating efforts to
enforce integrity and prevent corruption within the Ministry and the National Agency for Border
Management and Regional Government" (Pradifta, 2022).
Based on the performance report of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Energy and
Mineral Resources, in general, the achievement of Itjen's performance in 2022 has been as
expected, but there are several things that need attention. Itjen will continue to strive for
continuous improvement to improve performance through the achievement of key performance
and other performances.
Thus, if the APIP function runs well, it can prevent fraud, resulting in valuable outputs to be
input for external, executive and legislative auditors in improving regional financial management
and accountability in the future. BPK can utilize the results of APIP supervision, especially from the
results of reviews of government financial statements, support local government management in
implementing BPK recommendations and improving the internal control system. Professional and
independent APIP encourages increased transparency and accountability of financial
management that can improve the fairness of financial statements (NAVIANTIA, 2020)
Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that the quality of the APIP supervision
results of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs was considered good because
the results of the supervision had met the established standards, namely accurate, objective, and
comprehensive.
CONCLUSION
The performance of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) of the
Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs in the implementation of supervision of local
government administration in general is quite good. This is evidenced by the good quality of
supervisory results, high reliability of supervisory results, and the effectiveness of follow-up
supervision results is quite high. The quality of the APIP supervision results of the Inspectorate
General of the Ministry of Home Affairs is considered good because the results of the supervision
have met the established standards, namely accurate, objective, and comprehensive. The reliability
of the APIP supervision results of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs is
considered high because the results of the supervision have been supported by strong evidence.
Septia Mentari, Irfan Ridwan Maksum
6 JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024
The effectiveness of the follow-up results of the APIP supervision of the Inspectorate General of
the Ministry of Home Affairs is considered quite high because most of the supervisory findings
have been followed up by local governments. However, there are still several things that need to
be improved in the performance of APIP Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs,
namely There needs to be an increase in the understanding of APIP of the Inspectorate General
of the Ministry of Home Affairs on laws and regulations related to the implementation of local
government. There needs to be increased coordination and cooperation between APIP
Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Home Affairs and regional APIP. There needs to be
increased support from the central and local governments for the implementation of supervision
of local government administration.
REFERENCES
Bakri, B., Mahsyar, A., & Malik, I. (2019). Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah Di
Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten Takalar. JPPM: Journal of Public Policy and Management,
1(2), 4956.
Dewi, H. A. (2022). Independensi Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah Guna Pelaksanaan Good
Governance Berbasis CACM Di Lingkungan Pemerintah Daerah. Arena Hukum, 15(2), 399
422.
EFFENDI, R. (2023). Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah Di Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten
Mamasa. Universitas Bosowa.
Fathanah, S., & Kasim, A. (2022). Pengaruh Manajemen Dalam Mendukung Pencapaian Tujuan
Pada Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu
Pemerintahan, 8(1), 184196.
Hara, E. K., & Adib, N. (2014). A Performance Analysis Of Regional Inspectorate Functions.
Herlina, B., Zulfachry, Z., Sumarni, S., & Syamsiar, S. (2023). Analisis Kinerja Aparat Pengawas
Internal Pemerintah (APIP) dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance di Kantor Inspektorat
Daerah Kabupaten Wajo. Journal on Education, 5(4), 1592115927.
NAVIANTIA, I. K. E. A. (2020). Audit Opinion on Government Financial Report: Evidence from Local
Governments in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics & Management, 14(1).
Pradifta, A. E. (2022). Kebijakan Pengawasan untuk Efektivitas Penanganan Pengaduan
Masyarakat ada Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan,
6(4), 69907006.
Prihartono, P., Theresia, T., & Mayangsari, S. (2018). Pengaruh Integritas, Objektivitas, dan
Kompetensi Auditor Internal Terhadap Efektivitas Audit Internal Dengan Gaya
Kepemimpinan Demokrasi Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pada Inspektorat Jenderal
Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 5(1), 6388.
Priyadi, H. (2023). Kewenangan Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset,
Dan Teknologi Dalam Melakukan Pengawasan Intern Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan
Pemerintah. " Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(3), 20.
Sari, D. (2013). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah, implementasi standar akuntansi
pemerintahan, penyelesaian temuan audit terhadap penerapan prinsip-prinsip tata kelola
pemerintahan yang baik (Penelitian pada pemerintah daerah di Provinsi Jawa Barat dan
Evaluation of the Performance of the Government's Internal Supervisory Apparatus in
Local Government Supervision: a Case Study of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry
of Home Affairs
JTUS, Vol. 02, No. 1 January 2024 7
Banten).
Siregar, A. R., & Salomo, R. V. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Efektivitas
Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Dalam Negeri Dalam Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan
Pemerintahan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Suara Khatulistiwa, 5(1), 2737.
Syarifudin, A. (2014). Pengaruh kompetensi SDM dan peran audit intern terhadap kualitas laporan
keuangan pemerintah daerah dengan variabel intervening sistem pengendalian internal
pemerintah (studi empiris pada Pemkab Kebumen). Fokus Bisnis: Media Pengkajian
Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 13(2).
Syawalina, C. F., Elviza, E., Susanti, E., & Nadya, C. (2022). Pengaruh Pengawasan Inspektorat
Daerah dan Kompetensi Perangkat Desa terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa di
Kecamatan Jaya Baru Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilman: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 10(3), 143
151.
Utari, W., & Wibowo, N. M. (2021). Pengaruh Disiplin, Lingkungan Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja
Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pengawasan Internal Pemerintah (Apip) Inspektorat Kabupaten
Bojonegoro. Dinamika Administrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Manajemen, 4(1).
Yohanes, E. (2018). Peran Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (APIP) Dalam Penyelenggaraan
Pemerintahan Daerah di Kabupaten Bulungan. Jurnal Paradigma (JP), 7(2), 5564.
Yuliani, W. (2018). Metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dalam perspektif bimbingan dan
konseling. Quanta, 2(2), 8391.
Copyright holder:
Septia Mentari, Irfan Ridwan Maksum (2023)
First publication right:
Journal Transnational Universal Studies (JTUS)
This article is licensed under: